Jane Hansen was one of the
most remarkable Christian leaders I have ever known. She was for many years the President of Aglow
Ministries International headquartered in Seattle. Most of my readers will not know her or much
about Aglow Ministries, but I sat as a member of their advisory board for the 7
years I served as Rector of St. Luke’s in Seattle. Aglow is an independent evangelistic ministry
aimed at women and strongly associated with The Assemblies of God and also
other various Pentecostal denominations.
For those 7 years, I watched one of the best managed Christian
organizations that I have known. Jane’s
ministry team was very professional and at the same time a wonder example of a
Christian team ministry. Ironically as a
woman, Jane would not have been allowed to be a pastor in her own denomination though
she ran a ministry that vastly outnumbered any of their churches.
I was on the Advisory Board because
my predecessor at St. Luke’s was before me.
I sort of inherited the position.
The board of Aglow has a bit of an unusual organization. It was comprised of Jane and her Vice
Presidents all of whom headed up a major division of Aglow. The Advisory Board was made up of six area
pastors most of whom headed large, 2000 plus ASA, congregations. I wish I could say more about Aglow’s work back
in the 80s, but it would take too long. I
want to focus one of the primary things that I learned from Jane.
During one Board meeting a
group made up of local fundamentalist and evangelical organizations made a
presentation on abortion. They
represented a national organization that was trying to get every conservative
denomination and para-church ministry to sign a common declaration opposing
abortion in the strongest terms possible. After an hour of presenting their
point of view, they concluded with how important it would be for Aglow
Ministries to sign on and how strange it would be if they refused.
Now remember, all the
board members were women, most were grandmothers, and all would have been
clearly opposed to abortion. After the
group left, Jane asked the advisors for comments. Three of the pastors were strongly in favor
of them signing on. Three others of us weren’t so sure. For me, it felt like the presenters were a
bit intimidating and certainly they were pushing to get Aglow to sign on.
After we had spoken, Jane
paused and looked at her board members.
Several of them were members of two of the Churches represent by
advisors in the room. She then asked if
we would mind stepping out of the room for a few minutes while she had an conversation
with her fellow leaders. Half an hour
later, we were invited back in.
“Well what did you
decide?” asked one of the pastors who had been vocally in favor of them signing
on. Jane pause, smiled, and then said gently, “We have decided that it would
not be right for us to sign on to this declaration.”
That Pastor looked
stunned. “Why not,” he angrily replied. Here is how Jane answered:
“Pastor, you know how all of us feel
about his issue. It was a difficult
decision for us. However, when we
thought about our mission to introduce women to Jesus Christ it caused us to
stop and ask this question; what if one woman decided not to attend an Aglow
meeting because she once had an abortion? Then we would be failing to carry out
our mission.”
What did Jane and her
associates grasp? Long before secular
writers wrote about this, they knew that a ministry, denomination, and
congregation needed to remember to keep the main thing the main thing.
I have consulted with many
congregations and worked with three dioceses and time after time I had to remind
myself of the importance of keeping the main thing the main thing. This is often a difficult discipline for
leaders to keep. Keeping it means that leaders need not to dilute their effectiveness by adding more and
more good things to what they are called to do.
Next, leaders need a way to say “no” to what they are not called to do. Of course, the discipline is
dependent on two other things.
1. You have to
know what the main thing is!
2. You have to organize everything around it.
Most Episcopal
Churches that I’ve worked with have no idea what their main thing is. When I ask leaders to share their mission and
core values, I often find the mission is so vague that they are not able to
build a strategy around it. In addition,
they will list 20 or more core values and some of these congregations have less than 100 people present on any
given Sunday.
The congregation that I
served in Seattle was just like this.
They had way too many good things and no way of centering on what the
main thing was. So my first work was to
find the main thing. Then we set to work
carrying out strategies that made the main thing the main thing. In three years, the congregation, already
large by Episcopal standards, became the largest it had ever been in its
history. Then we launched a daughter
congregation as a part of our strategy.
My advice to every leader
is to always Make the Main Thing the
Main Thing!
VAMONK, I don't know what happened to your comment, but the leader begins by asking the right questions to find out what the main thing is. Of course, in one sense, for a church the main thing is the mission of the church "Reconcile all people to"... from PB and the two core values of the Great Commission and Great Commandment. It also has to be contextualized to your setting.
ReplyDeleteMorning Kevin - This is more a comment about the "Main Thing". Great article and I couldn't agree more. Toward that intent...it's been my experience that Jesus prioritized all of Scripture with His "main thing" of the 1st commandment (Love God) and the 2nd (love your neighbor) and 3rd - "Go and make disciples."
ReplyDeleteYes, indeed he did. I think one of Bishop Payne's strengths was to focus on the Mission, the great commandment and the great commission. Good to have your comment.
Delete